Lords criticise 'overly inflexible culture' in commercial re/insurance regulation

The Industry and Regulators Committee has written to the economic secretary to the Treasury, John Glen (pictured), to outline the concerns about a lack of proportionality in the regulation of the London Market by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority, which was described as “overly demanding and burdensome”.

The Committee also outlined the evidence it heard that an “overly inflexible culture” within the regulators may have inhibited the development of new forms of business, such as in ILS and captives.

It emphasised the need for the government’s proposal to introduce a secondary competitiveness and growth objective for the financial regulators to be reinforced with clear criteria and appropriate performance measures for the regulators to report on, ensuring they reflect on their performance against this objective and allowing scrutiny by stakeholders, including the Committee.

Lord Hollick, chair of the Industry and Regulators Committee, said: “While the Committee welcomes the continued success of the London Market, we are concerned that the UK may lose out on new and fast growing areas of business because of an overly inflexible and bureaucratic regulatory framework. There is a need for regulators to consider whether current rules could be applied more proportionately and regulators should ensure that their rule books are achieving their objectives in the most efficient way possible.

“The Committee agrees that there are strong arguments in favour of the Government’s proposal of a secondary competitiveness and growth objective for the financial regulators, enabling them to consider to a greater extent their impact on the industry in addition to their impact on the safety and soundness of firms. However, to ensure that regulators’ behaviour is genuinely responsive to the secondary objective the Government and regulators must formulate clear performance measures that will be reported on annually, ensuring that this Committee and others can hold the regulators to account for their performance.”

Glen gave evidence to the Committee last week as part of the inquiry.

    Share Story:

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE


Cyber risk in the transportation industry
The connected nature of the transport and logistics industries makes them an attractive target for hackers, with potentially disruptive and costly consequences. Between June 2020 and June 2021, the transportation industry saw an 186% increase in weekly ransomware attacks. At the same time, regulations and cyber security standards are lacking – creating weak postures across the board. This podcast explores the key risks. Published April 2022.

Political risk: A fresh perspective
CIR’s editor, Deborah Ritchie speaks with head of PCS at Verisk, Tom Johansmeyer about the confluence of political, nat cat and pandemic risks in a world that is becoming an increasingly risky place in which to do business. Published February 2022.