VIEW: On hitting the claims sweet spot

Sometimes, it can feel that insurance payouts are elusive creatures. Small risks are too inconsequential to merit a payout, and are dispensed with by excesses. Huge risks, on the other hand, are either excluded or subject to arbitrary payment limits. So getting a payout becomes a question of hitting the sweet spot between a claim event that is too small and a claim event that is too big. There are many sound commercial reasons for insurance companies excluding both small and very large claims, but it can create a feeling that the sector runs a ‘heads you lose, tails I win’ approach.

Is there a clearer way to present the logic behind insurers’ approach to exclusions that is related to consumer needs? Perhaps one approach might be to link payments to benchmarks; rather than to absolute monetary amounts. For example, if there is a huge event, such as a national lockdown for a pandemic, it is not unreasonable to assume that the government that introduces a lockdown is also going to put in place financial measures to mitigate the impact for firms and individuals.

To maintain cover for everyday risks while excluding cover for huge, systemic risks that the government should be catering for, policies could promise to make payments relative to a certain benchmark. So, for example, if we are living under a regime of social distancing, the policy would not pay out if a business’s income fell in line with the benchmark for the rest of the sector that is also subject to social distancing. But if that business suffered flooding, the insurance would cover the loss of revenue that exceeded the benchmark.

Of course, this approach has its own challenges – which benchmark do you choose? How do you know you are applying the right benchmark to a particular business? How do you explain the extra complexity that comes with this novel approach? However, despite these challenges, this design could help to reduce confusion about what a policy is all about – whether it is an expensive policy for all risks, or a more affordable one for medium-sized ones.

    Share Story:

Recent Stories

Financial institutions were early adopters of cyber security and insurance. Are they still on top of the game?
Managing huge amounts of sensitive data online makes financial institutions a prime target for hackers. As such, the sector was an early cohort for insurers in creating cyber cover. Since then, the market has evolved almost beyond recognition. It continues to challenge itself to this day, complying with rigorous regulatory demands and implementing avant-garde enhancements to keep abreast of the ever-changing risks. Published June 2021

Manufacturing: An industry at risk amid great technological change
Of the many sectors of business, manufacturing companies are among the most at risk from cyber threats. How has the sector evolved to make it so vulnerable and what does the task of managing cyber exposure in a manufacturing company look like? CIR’s latest podcast with Tokio Marine HCC sought to answer all these questions and more. Published April 2021