The Financial Services Authority's (FSA) plan to extend the IMAP by over a year is likely to be met by disappointment from many of the largest insurers, says PwC, most having committed time and resources to progressing for a mid-2012 delivery.

Commenting on the FSA's revised implementation assumptions for Solvency II released today, Jim Bichard, insurance partner at PwC, said, “Today's FSA announcement is helpful as it removes some of the distracting debate and formally assumes a year's delay in implementation to 2014. Despite this, insurers will be keen for more detail from the FSA on the practical implications of complying with two parallel regimes in 2013.

“Insurers are likely to view the revised timetable differently depending on where they are positioned in the process. At one level, it is encouraging that the IMAP window start date remains the same, but the timetable extension risks some companies losing momentum and with little time for remediation.

This, he believes, will add to the industry’s concerns that any additional delays will add unnecessary costs as 'second tier' firms will have to rely increasingly on independent assurance that their model plans are fit for purpose, as indicated in May of this year.

“Given the fact that using an internal model versus the standard formula can generally produce significant capital savings, insurers will be concerned that they might be left waiting until well into 2013 to see if their model has been approved.

"The pushback on when standard models will be approved is also significant for the industry given the increase in firms who are looking to follow this route.

Both these delays will leave little time for insurers to either make changes to their models and fully embed them in their businesses or make tailored adjustments to the standard formula before the 'go live' date, he warns.

Risk consulting firm, PA, advises that firms do three things on the back of the FSA's announcement:

1. Maintain momentum. There is a lot of work still required in relation to the applications. Firms have a chance to prioritise their efforts, keeping their resources focused on application related activity.

2. Engage with the regulator. FIrms should be talking to their supervisors to understand which landing slot they have been given and the implications for their plans.

3. Improve application quality. Firms now have a longer window meaning that there should be more time to do more things to improve the quality of their submissions and to embed the new ways of working into their organisation.

Share Story: